(February 23, 2014 at 5:11 pm)Rayaan Wrote: ... according to the Taoist view, the universe has an endless scalability of patterns, of ordering ...Citation needed.
(February 23, 2014 at 5:11 pm)Rayaan Wrote: ... you said that you consider elegance to be a property existing in a rather "disorganized pattern." ...Citation needed.
(February 23, 2014 at 5:11 pm)Rayaan Wrote: Secondly, I've provided two sources that support what I said, which is what you're supposed to refute in order to justify that I'm wrong in making the point above.Supposed to? According to whom? I told you I wasn't interested in an in-depth debate, so you respond in-depth and fault me for not engaging you in depth. That's an obvious and dishonest tactic.
(February 23, 2014 at 5:11 pm)Rayaan Wrote: The Complete Idiot's Guide to TaoismYes, you've already demonstrated that you don't know shit from shinola about Taoism. You're just trying to bury me in detail. It's the typical argumentum ad nauseum of a religious fucktard.
(February 23, 2014 at 5:11 pm)Rayaan Wrote: If you think that my understanding of the quotes above is a "misunderstanding" or you think that the quotes themselves are misinformation, then go ahead and prove it, if you can.That is not the way of the Tao. And if I remember the little I've read about the relationship between Kalam and Islam, it is not the way of the Muslim, either.
(February 23, 2014 at 5:11 pm)Rayaan Wrote: And if you can't do that, then don't waste your time trying to act as if you're right without presenting anything to support that even.Fuck you. You want Taoism. You got Taoism. If you can't handle that, it can't be helped. You are just a dull pupil.
![[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]](https://i.postimg.cc/zf86M5L7/extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg)