(March 6, 2014 at 9:15 am)shep Wrote: The argument assumes we need a creator.I asked before, but wouldn't "the big bang" fit the argument just as well as "god"? The argument simply indicates that something must have caused the universe to exist. Why wouldn't that something be "the big bang"? Or even "Marduk, from the corpse of Tiamat"?
"Well, evolution is a theory. It is also a fact. And facts and theories are different things, not rungs in a hierarchy of increasing certainty. Facts are the world's data. Theories are structures of ideas that explain and interpret facts. Facts don't go away when scientists debate rival theories to explain them. Einstein's theory of gravitation replaced Newton's in this century, but apples didn't suspend themselves in midair, pending the outcome. And humans evolved from ape- like ancestors whether they did so by Darwin's proposed mechanism or by some other yet to be discovered."
-Stephen Jay Gould
-Stephen Jay Gould