RE: Neo Paganism
March 9, 2014 at 2:25 pm
(This post was last modified: March 9, 2014 at 2:29 pm by nintendo048.)
(March 9, 2014 at 2:18 pm)Esquilax Wrote:there is no uniform process of debate this is not philosophy class she admitted that is gay and that she sees gay people as repellant. I am correct(March 9, 2014 at 2:05 pm)jimmyk2190 Wrote: no they arent you responses are just inherently wrong
Rrrgh, I wasn't even going to comment in this thread, but these single sentence "inherently wrong," style posts just make my goddamn head explode.
This is lazy argumentation, good sir: instead of having a reasoned and well thought out response, you decide to just circumvent the entire process of discussion by claiming that the wrongness of your opponent's position is some background feature of the universe?
Not done, Jimmy. Not. Done.
(March 9, 2014 at 2:18 pm)Esquilax Wrote:she asked me why i though wicca was stupid i had no reason for this other that it was not to my liking so i decided to prove that not only did she not like it by neither oes anybody else they are just play acting(March 9, 2014 at 2:05 pm)jimmyk2190 Wrote: no they arent you responses are just inherently wrong
Rrrgh, I wasn't even going to comment in this thread, but these single sentence "inherently wrong," style posts just make my goddamn head explode.
This is lazy argumentation, good sir: instead of having a reasoned and well thought out response, you decide to just circumvent the entire process of discussion by claiming that the wrongness of your opponent's position is some background feature of the universe?
Not done, Jimmy. Not. Done.
