RE: The redneck strike again.
March 12, 2014 at 10:17 am
(This post was last modified: March 12, 2014 at 10:33 am by Little Rik.)
(March 12, 2014 at 10:11 am)Jacob(smooth) Wrote: How would we know whether a wild animal living in the wild died of a CV problem? Out of interest enrico, do you have a source for that?
I'm guessing Intuitional science again. It makes sense to me ergo it's true?
You don't really need intuitional science to know that if you put a wild animal in a cage it will get sick.
By the way your statement is incorrect.
The wild dog in question was living in a cage not in the wild.
(March 12, 2014 at 10:17 am)Esquilax Wrote:(March 12, 2014 at 10:12 am)enrico Wrote: Your stupidity is behind belief.
Your link say............A 9-year-old apparently healthy male African wild dog (Lycaon pictus) was found dead in its
enclosure at the De Wildt Cheetah and Wildlife Centre...........
What this means?
It means that when you take a wild dog inside a cage it is natural that the poor dog will get sick.
Is really important to know how the body-mind of the dog reacted and what is the disease that originate from that captivity?
All you do is try to divert the issue which is that if you leave the wild animals alone under normal condition they want get sick.
So: I've provided scientific evidence that there is at least one species of wild dog that gets heart disease. Now where's your scientific evidence that wild dogs in the wild don't get heart disease?
To be clear, I don't need to run when you're not chasing me: you haven't established even a single thread of your claim, whereas I've provided at least one hundred percent more evidence than you that you're wrong.
Is this an evidence thing, or an intuitional science thing, moron?
It must be my fault then.
I didn't know that i am talking with idiots that can not understand that when i say wild dogs or wild animals i mean wild animals living in the wild not inside cages.
My deep apologies to idiots.
(March 12, 2014 at 9:15 am)jg2014 Wrote:(March 12, 2014 at 8:39 am)enrico Wrote: I already show you the reference and that is coming from uni scholars.
A step higher as far as knowledge there is God but is not much good for an atheist, isn't it?
http://hypertextbook.com/facts/2001/Anne...sino.shtml
That is the same reference you posted as before which shows that the human intestines are around 7 to 8 m in length, and therefore are around 4 to 5 times the length of the human body. According to table you posted before from the vegan sceptic site that would make us omnivores.
The link say.........."The human intestine is ten times longer than the length of the body,... It's minimum length is 507, its maximum length 1194 centimeters (17 to 35 feet);... so how did you work out that insted it is 4-5 times?
Here i got a very interesting link (all peer of course).
Here we are all involved.
http://christwire.org/2012/03/vegetarian...-morality/