(March 12, 2014 at 6:36 pm)discipulus Wrote: Beccs and Pickup_shonuff...
Lend me your ears! *clears throat* err...umm....your eyes rather! : /
To Beccs:
You have confidently asserted that anything that requires apologetics is fundamentally flawed.
If this is your view, then according to you, science is fundamentally flawed because people ever since its inception, some scientists and some from other disciplines, have defended it and do defend it through the systematic use of information which is all apologetics is.
So thank you for your insight. Once again you have demonstrated you should not be heeded.
Science has verifiable evidence and that which is proven to be wrong is thrown own. Religion has people who desperately attempt to reinterpret what is in their book - unchanging, according to most - says to fit it into a modern context.
Thanks for proving the desperation of your attempts - especially citing CARM as a resource. Once again you've shown yourself to be both arrogant and ignorant.
Playing Cluedo with my mum while I was at Uni:
"You did WHAT? With WHO? WHERE???"