Totally NOT a debate about the veracity of the gospels

[Mudhammam]

But since none of what you wrote in any way undercuts or rebuts my statement, which is a statement of fact

Enter straw man:

i.e. that people defend the pursuits of science, it can be dismissed.

In fact, I can be charitable and agree for the sake of your argument that Christian apologists (I assume you mean this when using the word "apologist") are ignorant narrow minded imbeciles.

I prefer the term "deluded" but if we're going for more colorful language I'm happy with Big-Footers or UFO abductees, though admittedly those claims are more likely than any uniquely Christian belief.