(March 12, 2014 at 8:06 pm)Pickup_shonuff Wrote:(March 12, 2014 at 8:01 pm)pocaracas Wrote: "the underlying content is ok... the details may be sketchy", am-I-rite, fr0d0?
That's what I thought he meant... but can someone explain to me how the "inerrant version," or the deeper truths conveyed by man's fallibility, are so poorly communicated that Christianity hosts some 30,000+ different sects and denominations who can't even agree on how to interpret these "deeper truths"? Seems to me like God's a rather powerless and inept communicator.
I blame the messenger
He's using a pretty crappy one. But that's what we have. You could have it perfectly stated. What would that benefit you? Genesis seems very well crafted in comparison to the gospels, but then you have very different styles of books.
