Kudos to the above.
Historians look for things like divergence in details and similitude in major events. This is what you expect to find if multiple people are writing accounts of a series of events.
So actually instead of serving to discredit the gospels, incidents like the one in question serve only to substantiate it.
Historians look for things like divergence in details and similitude in major events. This is what you expect to find if multiple people are writing accounts of a series of events.
So actually instead of serving to discredit the gospels, incidents like the one in question serve only to substantiate it.