Why are we even having this discussion? Even if we grant this argument on every point, these guys are still equivocating by saying that all faith is equal. It's just demonstrably not; me having "faith" in things that have evidence doesn't suddenly make believing things on faith that have no evidence more rational.
We should any of us feel the need to rebut an argument that is, at its heart, dishonest?
We should any of us feel the need to rebut an argument that is, at its heart, dishonest?
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!