(March 19, 2014 at 3:18 am)fr0d0 Wrote: Plenty ad homs, no argument. I don't discuss philosophy because I'm not interested in it. You need to take that up with people that are. I'm interested to read what philosophers say.
You refuse to address me where I am, then call me names because I cannot address philosophy. I have no further interest in your wankfest.
He laid it out for you clearly, in an easy to understand fashion. You're backpedaling because the garbage you tried to pass as an argument doesn't hold up to scrutiny.
If you have no interest in philosophy, but are interested in what philosophers say, how do you judge the merits of a work? Whether or not it appears in AiG's approved books list?