(March 21, 2014 at 2:53 am)Esquilax Wrote: Yes, I'm holding god to exactly the same moral standard I would hold a human being to, and you're trying to get me to hold him to a lesser standard, because that's the only one you can use and still find god to be morally sufficient in any area.
I apologize for saying you are not bright but usually when an atheist argues about god in comparison to a human it is a strawman argument and intellectually dishonest. Back to the topic.....
I am going to start from ignosticism because you assertions are presupposing far too much. It is very anthropocentric which is worse than being a geocentrist.
If you created a costume computer, highly complex and is automated do you have the right to destroy it unconditionally?
Quote:If I accepted your claim, where would our point of disagreement be? That's what I'm saying, I don't accept outright, based on nothing but your assertion, that god has earned the right to be sovereign over us. Your next move should be to demonstrate your initial claim, not just insult my intelligence. That's not an argument.
We shall see to this. Sorry about mild attack. ......supposedly cats make things better, I myself hate cats.