(March 21, 2014 at 9:35 am)Chuck Wrote: I am not sure if claiming some local pretenses towards rationalism while pathologically absorbed in an globally overwhelmingly irrational framework can count as lucid or rational.
I did state it in relative terms to the other apologists and remark how scary that is, as in this is the closest Christianity gets to being "rational".
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist