RE: Question
March 23, 2014 at 5:38 pm
(This post was last modified: March 23, 2014 at 5:40 pm by My imaginary friend is GOD.)
(March 23, 2014 at 5:07 pm)BrokenQuill92 Wrote: If Duck spends time as a girl but is truly a duck does that make mean her relationship with a human equals beastiality? Or does it not count since she is just as sentient as a bird? And does it only count as beastiality if she were non-sentient; or simply count by being another species?Did not watch the video but going to respond anyway.
Since she is not in the physical form of a duck, it does not count as bestiality, and I don't even think that a "relationship" in itself even can be called bestiality, only the sexual act of fucking an animal. Her sentience is not actually relevant, except morally. It might be morally wrong to fuck someone with the sentience of a duck if it is also morally wrong to fuck a duck because it cannot consent.
However, this gets really kind of morally confusing because a duck can consent to sex with another duck, in a sense, I guess. I mean, it can indicate it is willing to have sex, right? Is that the same thing as "consent" as we humans understand it? I don't know. If it IS however, the same thing as when humans consent to sex, then maybe it is possible that this being who has the sentience of a duck and the body of a human can also, in the way that a duck consents to sex with another duck, consent to sex with a human.
If this ever were ever in the position potentially fuck a being with the sentience of a duck and the body of a human and for some reason I wanted to do it, I would still choose not to do it because it would seem morally wrong to me, as if I were taking advantage of someone with autism or down's syndrome.
