One philosophical argument for existence of supernatural.

[sven]

So belief in objective value cannot be a product of nature? How so?

I'm not saying it can't be a product of nature, I'm saying having knowledge that there is such a thing cannot be simply a product of material forces with no supernatural involved. I already explained the reason, because, in evolution, we would've gained a sense of value and it would've worked without having knowledge of an actual value/worth.

Faith in objective value/praise existing to me can't be wrong. I know it to be true.

I'm arguing this knowledge on faith would not be knowledge were it the case of naturalism. Since it is knowledge, naturalism is not true.

I assume you mean that humanistic naturalism is 'not true'?