RE: Wrath of God
April 9, 2010 at 11:35 am
(This post was last modified: April 9, 2010 at 11:38 am by Ace Otana.)
I have to agree with adrian. Unless there is evidence to suggest this really happened and that the drink had no poison in it (which is unprovable as the drink was not preserved for testing) then this so called warning will not be taken seriously.
Quote:Why would the bartender poison the drink, if that is what happened? They would have no interest in faking the wrath of God.There is no evidence to suggest that god exists at all and to conclude that a drink killed them because of what they said about god does not prove god's existance. The most likely reason for their deaths would be that the partender posioned their drinks.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence - Carl Sagan
Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.
Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.
You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.
Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.
Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.
You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.
