(March 26, 2014 at 7:20 pm)Losty Wrote: No wrong. The state has the right to be concerned with children because they are people.
You can scientifically prove what is a human being sure, but science doesn't define personhood.
Suppose I am out hunting in the woods and I see some bushes move and I shoot into those bushes because it might be the kind of animal I am hunting. Sadly...it turns out a 5 year old child is shot dead.
Was it immoral of me to shoot with the intent to kill without knowing what it is I was killing?
In situations where personhood cannot be ascertained....which is your situation as you claim personhood can't be defined....isn't the morally correct course of action to take the safest route?
The inability to define personhood is not an argument for abortion. The inability to define personhood is an argument for life.
