Evidence for god? Convince me! [CHALLENGE]

[orangebox21]

Don't mean to come off, as I likely did, as antagonistic to you. Little tired from work/studying for mid-terms.

Understandable, I remember what that was like.

By 'reliable' I mean trustworthy and unchanging.

Well then unless we're going the whole 9-yards and doubting memory too, it seems clear we have good inductive grounds for our senses' reliability as you define it.

For my clarification, from what premise are you deducing the conclusion 'our senses are reliable and trustworthy' from?

Actually, I have ruled out the possibility of God's existence. However, I did not/do not do so merely because of a presupposition that non-physical things cannot exist.

Out of curiosity how did you rule out the possibility of God's existence? Secondly, if you believe that non-physical things cannot exist how do you account for universal laws of logic? They are non-physical things.

I don't think the God concept, as has been presented to me, is logically coherent, and I find many faults in all of the arguments for God's existence as well.

Would you care to share one of the logically incoherent arguments for God's existence that has been presented to you?