My sympathies for pantheism

[archangle]

They can't measure its location because the particle they use to "measure" is close enough in size to the measrued particle that they can go anywhere when the hit eachother. Like trying to throw a stream of baseballs to find another baseball.

But if you use a auto bb gun to "see" a truck. You would know exactly where it is and where it is going.

Historically, the uncertainty principle has been confused with a somewhat similar effect in physics, called the observer effect, which notes that measurements of certain systems cannot be made without affecting the systems. Heisenberg offered such an observer effect at the quantum level (see below) as a physical "explanation" of quantum uncertainty. It has since become clear, however, that the uncertainty principle is inherent in the properties of all wave-like systems, and that it arises in quantum mechanics simply due to the matter wave nature of all quantum objects. Thus, the uncertainty principle actually states a fundamental property of quantum systems, and is not a statement about the observational success of current technology.

true, mine was a simple example.

wave like systems and quantum mech. What is the quantum world based on?

---

Pantheism to me just always seemed like poor Scientific analysis about the Universe. So, the universe is god to a Pantheist, but why such a Hasty Generalization when the universe was a starting point for existence at the singularity. The universe was clearly not a starting point for intelligence at the singularity (which theists of all stripes seem to always say) let alone a god/deity which would hypothetically be all intelligent/powerful/good/etc. Some have said Pantheists are just one step away from Atheists or even "Sexed up Atheists" but I don't see the correlation there. If anything, Pantheism could be looked at as the last step of rehab before kicking the theism habit. But it's quite different than being an Atheist I'd say, you still believe in the whole god thing as a Pantheist.

I agree!
I talked about something related in another thread, so I'd like to add a little of my own thinking.
The pantheist probably thinks a bit like this: 'Look! Hydrogen and oxygen are bonding in the stars to become water! We humans need water to exist! The universe is ordering itself to suit the needs of life!'
(I base this thought on my somewhat limited understanding of pantheism.)
If this is true, I believe that their logic is flawed in several ways.

Also. I believe that those atoms just follow the path of least resistance. If it would be easier for hydrogen to bond with some other type of atom than oxygen, it probably would, I think.
The former statement may sound overly simplified and dumbed down. I'm not even really certain if I'm right. But what I'm trying to say is that i find it hard to believe or proove that oxygen and hydrogen give a rats arse about what we want or need. It would follow that the universe doesn't, either.

I'm thinking about the novel 'Solaris' by Stanislaw Lem.
The classic quote goes something like this:
'We don't want other worlds. We want mirrors.'

The pantheist really wants the universe to mirror his own more or less sub-concious beliefs and desires. But just like the fictional planet Solaris, the universe doesn't care about humanity.
Solaris doesn't need to be understood or explained by humanity to exist.

I was never infected with the 'god virus' so the thought or feeling that there was some grand design at work didn't really hit me. I just didn't think about it at all. That's what it feels like to be an 'organic' atheist. Its not a dreadful feeling of emptiness and meaningless despair at all. You can't really feel the loss or lack of something you never even imagined existed in the first place.

leave the word god out. Can the universe be alive?