(April 17, 2014 at 8:34 pm)Ryantology (╯°◊°)╯︵ ══╬ Wrote: The only real claim I'm making is that 'supernatural' and 'imaginary' are, by all appearances, synonymous terms. Not that it's definitely so, just that 100% of the evidence so far points that way. You are insisting this is not true, which places the burden squarely on you. Only, you think it doesn't, because you insist that the supernatural is a special category that gets a special exception to the rules every other claim has to follow. Why? Because fraudo said so.
What evidence Ryan? There you go making that absurd claim again. Let me see, what will your defence be again... Oh yes, that it's not absurd because I didn't say the opposite. FFS mate get a clue.
It must be hard being such a twat.
