Atheists... why do you believe that God doesn't exist?
April 17, 2014 at 9:53 pm
(This post was last modified: April 17, 2014 at 10:03 pm by Rampant.A.I..)
(April 17, 2014 at 6:54 pm)fr0d0 Wrote:(April 17, 2014 at 10:30 am)Rampant.A.I. Wrote: Way to miss the point and shift the burden of proof again.
So, before you launch into another lie-rade, do you think "aha! Gotcha! There is NO evidence anyone can present to support this claim!" Is a compelling argument?
You say repeatedly that your faith "is rational" then refuse to elaborate further. Why is your specific entity, not just "the supernatural" completely immune from necessary evidence, unlike any reasonable belief?
Do you then believe every reported encounter with ghosts, imps, Djinn, Leprechauns, Unicorns, Fairies, and other supernatural entities? If not, why not?
You said yourself the supernatural doesn't need transferable evidence to be believable.
Is this a joke?
So do you admit defeat that you cannot actually prove the non existence of something supernatural?
So, you claim your deity cannot have transferable evidence (a characteristic of completely imaginary entities), and then want me to disprove it's existence without you first defining what you are asking me to disprove. You claim to have rational evidence for said entity, but are unable to provide anything, again, because it's conveniently "non-transferable." Not unlike someone who believes in leprechauns, which you reject as "something you never said," so I'll ask you again:
Do you believe in leprechauns, unicorns, or fairies? Why or why not?
I don't know what you believe in, you haven't outlined what you believe in, and yet you want me to provide you evidence of its absence. For all I know, your God could be a giant leprechaun, who goes by another name. Perhaps you could lay out some characteristics.
(April 17, 2014 at 6:54 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: Thanks. That's great.
I never have refused to explain how my faith is rational. Let's see you run away now for the THIRD time of asking what you want to address.
Repost or link this explanation. I have yet to see it.
(April 17, 2014 at 6:54 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: You repeat these meaningless tirades against some imaginary opponent whilst avoiding any direct confrontation.
How skeptical of you.
How can anyone "confront" an opponent who won't respond to the content of a post?
Google the meaning of the term "skeptical," I do not think that word means what you think it means.