If this is an exercise in showing that you can interpret an old book to mean anything you want it to mean then fair play. If this is serious then they are just using the same techniques as the Christians do when they interpret the bible to mean what they want it to mean.
Even if you could find really good evidence that Jesus was gay, what would it achieve? You could build a time machine, send the Christians back in time to watch Jesus getting frisky with a man, and they'd still bullshit an excuse.
Even if you could find really good evidence that Jesus was gay, what would it achieve? You could build a time machine, send the Christians back in time to watch Jesus getting frisky with a man, and they'd still bullshit an excuse.
