Ken Hamm really doesn't deserve anyone's serious consideration, unless you just enjoy the spectacle of someone fluently speaking utter bullshit.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: July 29, 2025, 1:00 pm
Thread Rating:
|
Observational Science vs. Historical Science?!
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
Observational Science vs. Historical Science?! - by Duke Guilmon - April 26, 2014 at 4:15 pm
RE: Observational Science vs. Historical Science?! - by Whateverist - April 26, 2014 at 4:21 pm
RE: Observational Science vs. Historical Science?! - by Duke Guilmon - April 26, 2014 at 4:24 pm
RE: Observational Science vs. Historical Science?! - by FreeTony - April 26, 2014 at 4:29 pm
RE: Observational Science vs. Historical Science?! - by Duke Guilmon - April 26, 2014 at 4:42 pm
RE: Observational Science vs. Historical Science?! - by Godlesspanther - April 26, 2014 at 5:45 pm
RE: Observational Science vs. Historical Science?! - by Angrboda - April 27, 2014 at 2:41 pm
RE: Observational Science vs. Historical Science?! - by BrianSoddingBoru4 - April 27, 2014 at 2:59 pm
RE: Observational Science vs. Historical Science?! - by MJ the Skeptical - April 27, 2014 at 6:53 pm
|
| Possibly Related Threads... | |||||
| Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
| The Historical Evidence for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ. | Nishant Xavier | 38 | 5759 |
August 7, 2023 at 10:24 pm Last Post: LinuxGal |
|
| British Non-Catholic Historian on Historical Longevity of the Roman Catholic Church. | Nishant Xavier | 36 | 3953 |
August 6, 2023 at 4:48 pm Last Post: LinuxGal |
|
| Isaiah 53, 700 B.C: Historical Evidence of the Divine Omniscience. | Nishant Xavier | 91 | 10090 |
August 6, 2023 at 2:19 pm Last Post: LinuxGal |
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
