Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: June 12, 2025, 3:44 am
Atheist Forums › Community › Atheism v
Observational Science vs. Historical Science?!

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
Observational Science vs. Historical Science?!
Duke Guilmon Offline
デユークギルモン
**
Religious Views: None.
Posts: 336
Threads: 32
Joined: April 23, 2014
Reputation: 20
#3
RE: Observational Science vs. Historical Science?!
April 26, 2014 at 4:24 pm
(April 26, 2014 at 4:21 pm)whateverist Wrote: Ken Hamm really doesn't deserve anyone's serious consideration, unless you just enjoy the spectacle of someone fluently speaking utter bullshit.

I do need to laugh once in a while. Tongue
[Image: guilmon_evolution_by_davidgtm3-d4gb5rp.gif]https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCOW_Ioi2wtuPa88FvBmnBgQ my youtube
Find
Reply


Atheist Forums › Community › Atheism v
Observational Science vs. Historical Science?!

Messages In This Thread
RE: Observational Science vs. Historical Science?! - by Duke Guilmon - April 26, 2014 at 4:24 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The Historical Evidence for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ. Nishant Xavier 38 5521 August 7, 2023 at 10:24 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  British Non-Catholic Historian on Historical Longevity of the Roman Catholic Church. Nishant Xavier 36 3607 August 6, 2023 at 4:48 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  Isaiah 53, 700 B.C: Historical Evidence of the Divine Omniscience. Nishant Xavier 91 9597 August 6, 2023 at 2:19 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)