RE: Argument #1: Transitional Fossils
May 2, 2014 at 11:24 am
(This post was last modified: May 2, 2014 at 11:33 am by Mister Agenda.)
(May 1, 2014 at 5:59 pm)Revelation777 Wrote: To me this is not a waste of time. You appear to feel differently. You also appear to feel you have superior intellect over such a person as I. To me this isn't about who is more knowledgeable. We are discussion eternal matters here and is of much more value in my opinion than speaking on sports or weather. That's just my 2 cents.
Judging from your appeals to 'Darwin and Obama are smart!', you seem to think the IQ of the persons whose authority you appeal to is of vital importance. If you've changed your mind, I trust we won't be hearing any more idiotic remarks to the effect of 'Person X agrees with me, do you think you're smarter than Person X?'.
(May 2, 2014 at 8:04 am)Bad Wolf Wrote: Rev, macroevolution is a term invented by creationists, not scientists. There is only evolution.
It's a valid scientific term hijacked by creationists, they didn't invent it. 'Darwinism' is a perfectly cromulent word too, but creationists have managed to hijack it to such a degree that in America you can almost count on someone using that term being a creationist.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macroevolut...f_the_term
I'm not anti-Christian. I'm anti-stupid.