(May 4, 2014 at 4:46 pm)Heywood Wrote:(May 4, 2014 at 4:35 pm)Rampant.A.I. Wrote: Which ones? Why do theists throw out statements like this without supporting them? Claims about "The eye being irreducibly complex" have been debunked decades ago, and theists still try to convince people they are.
The genome of Mycoplasma Laboratorium contains water marks that were designed by intellects which are of sufficient complexity that it would be unreasonable to ever think they evolved sans intellect.
The water marks contained in the genome of Mycoplasma Laboratorium are as follows:
Quote:watermark 1 an Html script which reads to a browser as text congratulating the decoder with an email link ([email protected]) to click to prove the decoding.
watermark 2 contains a list of authors and a quote from James Joyce: "To live to err, to fall, to triumph, to recreate life out of life".
watermark 3 contains more authors and a quote from Robert Oppenheimer (uncredited): "See things not as they are, but as they might be".
watermark 4 contains yet more authors and a quote from Richard Feynman: "What I cannot build, I cannot understand
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mycoplasma_laboratorium
Ok, so you have proved that a human-modified species contains watermarks they were genetically modified by humans to contain.
If humans are capable of this, why don't we see "made by God" tags in the genome of extant animals?
You claimed to have an example of irreducible complexity in the natural world, and yet the only one you've come up with is a laboratory experiment to produce seen nowhere else in nature?
How does that prove any naturally occurring species is "irreducibly complex"?
http://www.redorbit.com/news/science/123..._revealed/
