Theoretical physics shows "irreducible complexity" arguments invalid.

[Heywood]

Irreducible complexity is the name given to the argument that certain biological systems are too complex to have evolved from simpler, or "less complete" predecessors, through natural selection acting upon a series of advantageous naturally occurring, chance mutations. It is a bad name choice because even if humans were intelligently designed by God, they could still be reducible.

I think your criticism here is a bit nitty.

Look, you presented the irreducible complexity argument, and have yet to given an example of irreducibly complex organisms that could only have been intelligently designed by God.

This is quickly developing into a Hand Banana argument, ignoring how modern bananas were human cultivated as produce.

Negative Rampant....I did not present the irreducible complexity argument.

I did two things.

1)I challenged your accusation that theoretical physics renders all irreducible complexity arguments invalid.
2)I backed my challenge by showing irreducible complexity exists in some biological systems.