RE: Theoretical physics shows "irreducible complexity" arguments invalid.
May 8, 2014 at 9:23 am
(May 7, 2014 at 9:22 pm)Heywood Wrote:(May 7, 2014 at 6:51 pm)Chas Wrote: You are dishonestly trying to recast the IC debate. Stop that.
There has been found no naturally occurring irreducible complexity, and I don't think Rampant said that there is no created IC.
This isn't an IC debate. We are not discussing if IC occurs "naturally". We are discussing if theoretical physics invalidates IC arguments. It does not.
You and Rampant are the ones being dishonest. After I easily demolished the original claim, you now want to change the discussion into one about whether or not IC occurs "naturally". You're calling me dishonest from the pile of rubble that is the original claim.
I am responding to your mischaracterization of what constitutes IC. You continue to attempt to obfuscate the subject by conflating that which is known to be constructed by humans with the naturally occurring.
You continue to be mistaken or dishonest.
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
