RE: Theoretical physics shows "irreducible complexity" arguments invalid.
May 10, 2014 at 2:21 am
(May 9, 2014 at 11:58 am)Heywood Wrote:(May 9, 2014 at 11:48 am)Rampant.A.I. Wrote: I'm saying quantum entanglement rules out the possibility that natural physical properties are to complex to have natural causes.
Of course, I could be wrong, if something were currently observable in nature too complex to have natural origins.
You're hung up on "natural". What difference would it make if God created the system of water marks in Mycoplasm_Labaritorium or if it is the creation of man? The system is still irreducibly complex.
No, I'm not hung up on natural - it's the fucking definition of IC.
No one is interested in your silly definition of it. It's not meaningful or interesting or constructive. It contributes nothing to the discussion.
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
