(May 21, 2014 at 6:17 am)BlackMason Wrote:(May 21, 2014 at 2:56 am)Losty Wrote: I'm glad I could assist you in making your case :p
Now if anyone would be so kind as to translate this into terms I can understand, that would be super awesome
My point was simply that our traditional concept of nothing most likely doesn't exist. Then someone mentioned quantum physics' version of nothing. You dug up the definition which pretty much suggests that something (the transitions) need to be acted on by something else (energy).
Thus, traditional concept of nothing < quantum physics definition of nothing.
Lol I got your point. I was more looking for an easier to understand quantum physics definition of nothing. Although, I think it's more a problem with being able to grasp the possibility than understanding the definition I guess. A ball of transitions which will become a something when you add energy? I always a transition was a verb not a noun. Hmmm