And what's really the inconsistent position here? Is it the pro-choice position, which treats the autonomy and quality of life of extant, sentient life as sacrosanct and thus (if you think about it for a second) has a vested interest in maintaining that quality of life for the future generations that statistics show will still exist, abortions or no? Or the religiously driven anti-choice side, that treats our entire existence on planet Earth as nothing more than a temporary pit stop on the way to the permanent happy land?
Which of us really has no reason to care about what happens to our planet? People in imaginary houses shouldn't throw stones at those of us in actual houses, Heywood.
Which of us really has no reason to care about what happens to our planet? People in imaginary houses shouldn't throw stones at those of us in actual houses, Heywood.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
