RE: Responding to posts.
May 23, 2014 at 7:51 pm
(This post was last modified: May 23, 2014 at 7:54 pm by Chas.)
(May 23, 2014 at 2:42 pm)Stimbo Wrote:(May 23, 2014 at 12:38 pm)Chas Wrote: Well, I never made a request - polite or not - I expressed my opinion of the way it works.
Yes you did; and the Staff, as well as regular grassroot members, who responded thus far expressed their opinions, alongside more specific technical reasons.
No, I did not. Quote it if you think so.
Quote:(May 23, 2014 at 12:38 pm)Chas Wrote: And I read MS's response as dismissive.
Personally I read it as informative, of the very thing you asked about. It was only dismissive in the sense of explaining why the answer's no.
As I said, his reply did not address what I said. And 'no' to what? I made no request.
Quote:(May 23, 2014 at 12:38 pm)Chas Wrote: I was looking for a discussion about why it is the way it is.
That's fine. How do you see this discusion progressing?
I'd like to see people weigh in with substantive comments.
(May 23, 2014 at 6:11 pm)Moros Synackaon Wrote:(May 23, 2014 at 1:53 pm)rasetsu Wrote: (ETA: Btw, is it 60 minutes or 120 minutes before it stops automerge? I always thought it was the edit window time.)60 minutes past last edit time, I believe.
I've been on forums where annoying signatures + a chain of posts from the same user becomes rather annoying.
While that happens occasionally, I suspect it is not very common.
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Science is not a subject, but a method.