(May 24, 2014 at 3:46 am)Marsellus Wallace Wrote:(May 24, 2014 at 3:42 am)Azurisy Wrote: The bushfires have already cleared, despite one of the hottest seasons to date. Casualties and losses of home had sadly escalated, not to mention the worst floods in Brisbane and northern NSW.
Australia is obviously very vast, with relatively a little small population. The estate prices are quite unaffordable and probably the highest in the world. As an architect, I investigate the legitimate, flexible, resourceful and sustainable architectural designs in order to accommodate diversifying family structures and possibly changing tenure arrangements.
I hope to rightly assume that this forum is American. As an exchange, I am pretty eager to make true friends of American atheists and explore any interesting American point at their and your sides.
How ? shouldn't low population mean low estate prices ?
Yes, this is a very strange fact. I have a theory. It is that, with its relatively low population, Australia is hardly progressive. Consequentially, with its lack of civilizational advances, is its lack of economic development. Its lack of economic development is probably making it too slow to foster the affordability of old, refurbish-able and brand new houses.
However, another theory is that, its lack of civilizational advances makes it too slow to harvest and utilise its natural, renewable and non-renewable resources at the pace of international goods and industrial trade.
I am too eager to hear your American viewpoint on that!
