Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
June 6, 2014 at 12:35 am (This post was last modified: June 6, 2014 at 12:46 am by JimmyNeutron.)
(June 6, 2014 at 12:23 am)Lemonvariable72 Wrote:
(June 5, 2014 at 7:54 pm)JimmyNeutron Wrote: This one is kinda complicated, so here goes:
The Book of Revelation was written around the year 95 A.D. You can read up on that HERE.
In Revelation 17 an angel is explaining the vision of John.
Fist can you demonstrate that he was indeed visited by a angel and that this angel was as he said he is?
Quote: He speaks about seven hills, saying "They are seven Kings; five have fallen, one is, the other has not yet come; and when he comes, he must remain a little while." This verse is translated various ways, all to the effect that the 7th king must reign for a short time.
So he's saying that there are seven kings that all have something in common, that make them all part of this set of seven. It then says that the beast is the eighth and is of the seven. So the antichrist shares this same commonality with the seven kings. It is widely accepted that the antichrist is likely to be descended from the Romans, specifically the Holy Roman Empire. Here is a big reason why:
Let me stop you here. The holy roman empire has as much to do with Romans as France does to french fries. They are descendants of the Romans from that area but rather they are descendant from the Germanic tribes that toppled Rome like the Frisians, franks, and Saxons. The holy roman empire was a title meant to invoke the glory of Rome, but in fact had nothing to do with the roman empire except occasionally kissing the popes ass.
Quote:There have been exactly seven emperors of the Holy Roman Empire with the name "Charles" and you can read a complete list HERE. You will notice that the 7th Charles reigned for only about 3 years. The logical next step in following this lead is to look for an eighth ruler of the HRE named Charles. Sure enough, there is an heir to the throne of the United Kingdom (which is descended, of course, from the HRE) who is named Charles. The current Prince of Wales. He is set to become King of Great Britain after the current monarch.
I would like to mention that is unlikely Charles will ever sit on the throne. The reason for this is because he has married a divorced woman, so the throne will fall to william when the old bag finally dies. Even if he does, Being the king of england would be a terrible position for a antichrist, as the king or queen of england has NO POWER. Speaking as a canadian and resident of a commonwealth country, our prime minster right would likely tell a monarch to piss off if they tried to affect any policy.
Quote:
Now, let's take a look at more of the prophecy that focuses on the identity of the antichrist. Revelation 13 contains one of the most famous passages in the Bible: "Here is the wisdom: let him who has understanding calculate the number of beast, for it is the number of a man. His number is 666." Virtually everyone knows of this piece of scripture. Many people have tried to calculate the number of the beast using various number systems. For example, increments of 6. A = 6, B = 12, etc.
There is only one system that actually makes sense here, the system of hebrew gematria. This is the system with which John would have been familiar. In hebrew, there are no numerical digits. Instead they use hebrew letters as numbers. Aleph, the first letter, is 1. Bet, the second, is 2, and so on. Once you reach the 10th letter, you start counting by tens. The 11th letter is 20, the 12th letter is 30, etc. When you reach 100, you count by hundreds. There are 22 letters in the hebrew alephbet. This means that the highest number is 400. This chart shows it all (hebrew is written right to left):
We can apply this same system to english letters as well. Note that we must stop at 400 or else we wouldn't be using the hebrew system, thus the last for letters of the english alphabet must be mapped to 0:
A = 1
B = 2
C = 3
D = 4
E = 5
F = 6
G = 7
H = 8
I = 9
J = 10
K = 20
L = 30
M = 40
N = 50
O = 60
P = 70
Q = 80
R = 90
S = 100
T = 200
U = 300
V = 400
W = 0
X = 0
Y = 0
Z = 0
The official title of the man in question is "Charles, Prince of Wales" or as some call him "Prince Charles of Wales." Either way, the following still applies:
C = 3
H = 8
A = 1
R = 90
L = 30
E = 5
S = 100
P = 70
R = 90
I = 9
N = 50
C = 3
E = 5
O = 60
F = 6
W = 0
A = 1
L = 30
E = 5
S = 100
I just want to point out that applying gematria to english makes fuck all for sense as they are about as far apart in linguistic development and eglish and chinese.
Please continue
Quote:
Add them together yourself if you like. Your result will be 666. This could be dismissed as a coincidence. But that explanation becomes less likely when you consider the following:
The name of the man in question in hebrew letters adds up to 666 as well. These two languages are important for this reason. If the Prince of Wales is the man spoken of in Revelation, then his name should add up to 666 in his native language (english in this case), as this is his given name. It should also add up in hebrew, as this is the language of the people to whom God was giving this prophecy. I won't go into it here, but the name also adds up to 666 in Greek, which was the trade language of John's day.
So, his name matches the other 7 kings (Charles)
His name adds up to 666 in English, Hebrew and Greek
The name "Charles" means "Manly" ("It is the number of a MAN")
What are your thoughts thus far? I am completely open for alternative explanation.
Holy crap you don't even know what language the book was wrtten in. It was not written in hebrew at all, But in koine greek. On top of that your basing your assumptions on biblical hebrew, which was a dead language by the time of jesus and those still spoke hebrew spoke mishniac hebrew which very different. At that those people accounted for a small minoirty and most people would have spoken greek or aramiac.
Actually, I DO know the language in which the book was written. I know it was greek, I didn't think I'd have to say something so obvious. If you read my post thoroughly you will see that I did in fact mention that the trade language of the day was greek. You should also notice that I also didn't say that the book was written in hebrew. I said it was for the Hebrew people. The name of Prince Charles equals 666 in English (Charles' native language), Hebrew (Israel's native language) and Greek (the common language of the day).
(June 6, 2014 at 12:17 am)Rampant.A.I. Wrote: I see all the debunking videos I posted were promptly ignored.
That is because they do not apply here. I did not use the bible code, and this isn't pattern seeking. If you really think that it is, then please show me where else in history an interpretation of the 7 Kings can be found.
In addition, to all those saying that the prophecies are too vague, there is a limited range of interpretation for them. Any given prophecy can only be stretched so far. So the more prophecies that can be interpreted to fit one thing, the less likely it is to be a coincidence. This is common sense. If I said that I was looking for someone with a red shirt, that could apply to many people. If I said they also had black hair, that limits it some more. The more I describe them, the fewer people there are who it could possibly be. The bible has a wealth of prophecies regarding the antichrist. The odds of any one person fitting all of them are incredibly slim.