Darwinian pretty much couldn't be more polite - for him to be attacked for "admin abuse" immediately sounds implausible as it is. Maybe not impossible but you only have to read what Darwinian actually said and he was doing his job perfectly well - no such "abuse" from him at all.
I find it particularly bizarre that Flying Skeptic seemed to think AngelThMan was being abused and needed defending when AngelThMan had already agreed and apologized, that is indeed bizarre. Why bother defending someone who has already apologized? Even if you do think they need defending for such a weird reason - can't you let them do their own thinking?
EvF
I find it particularly bizarre that Flying Skeptic seemed to think AngelThMan was being abused and needed defending when AngelThMan had already agreed and apologized, that is indeed bizarre. Why bother defending someone who has already apologized? Even if you do think they need defending for such a weird reason - can't you let them do their own thinking?
EvF
