RE: Can the laws of physics bring something into existence?
June 20, 2014 at 8:50 am
(This post was last modified: June 20, 2014 at 8:56 am by archangle.)
(June 15, 2014 at 11:38 am)Freedom of thought Wrote:(June 13, 2014 at 10:44 am)Rampant.A.I. Wrote: Agreed. There are few things more belligerently ignorant than claiming the laws of physics as observed today predate the universe, especially knowing the laws of physics were different at the beginning of the universe in Planck time.
Then how did the universe come to be, if there was absolutely nothing 'preceding' it? I know this is highly speculative conjecture, but regardless... Hawking seems to argue that because of these laws it means a universe can come from absolute nothing without a cause.
nobody knows the answer to this. Nobody
That being said, we also have to understand these guys want to be famous and earn a living so they make claims with a fair amount of certainty sometimes.
The universe could have started from "nothing" or "something". So we can pick one and try and defend it.
But nothing freaks me out more than "nothing" so I am a "something" guy. Quantum soup, brains, or even cyclic type of events. I am not a "creator" or "inventor' type tho.
You grammer nazi punk asses pick that "brain" up ... smart branes
(June 20, 2014 at 5:08 am)ignoramus Wrote: The "known" universe is getting bigger.
The unknown or undiscovered universe (-conjecture) is the same (just no objects in it yet ...isn't that what we mean by the "known" universe is getting bigger?)
Surely the universe isn't banging on the walls of the "sandbox" and stretching it out.
It just may be doing that exact thing.
Also, acceleration is change in speed or direction (or both). What if we are on a really big set of cosmic balls? The curve of the love eggs would be seen as acceleration form our view point.
