(June 25, 2014 at 9:59 am)Fidel_Castronaut Wrote:(June 25, 2014 at 9:55 am)archangle Wrote: We all make claims. Na, I aint clearifying it. I don't play mind fucked games. You know exactly what I mean. or you are stupid. Either way ...
No I've got no idea what you mean. But if you don't want to clarify I'll just assume you weren't saying anything of value, much like usual.
(June 25, 2014 at 9:55 am)archangle Wrote: Now back you the meat of your post.
When you claim "there is no nothing". you need evidence.
When you answer " I don't believe a guys rose from the dead because of ..." You are then correctly applying the scientific method with the limits of what is known.
Do I need to splaine that last paragraph for ya? 'Cause the quiz is tomorrow.
Well, as a PhD student I'm well aware of the scientific method, and I already outlined my position in the precious post which, funnily enough, you again didn't seem to reply to. I don't pretend to know what happens after we die although the lack of evidence for religious claims leads me to dismiss them.
So again I'll chalk it up to you not really saying anything of worth. Please carry on with the attitude problem though, it really suits you.
He's popped up in a couple of other threads saying the same kind of things to me. Is this the norm?
In every country and every age, the priest had been hostile to Liberty.
- Thomas Jefferson
- Thomas Jefferson
