(June 24, 2014 at 11:45 pm)Minimalist Wrote: 34 minutes of jesus freak drivel?

Based on Esquilax's summary, that's what it is. I prefer to skip those videos; if they really did have some new insight, we'd have theists tripping over each other to post them here. A list of 'arguments' where every argument boils down to "atheists are wrong because I don't want them to be right" isn't anything new.

(June 24, 2014 at 10:53 pm)Zidneya Wrote: As some of you remember when I joined the forum my first thread was about a Christian that constantly tried to convert me. And that I refused to block because I was determined to refute her. But eventually when she started to quote the creationism museum as the most reliable scientific source that proves atheism was wrong I decides to block her.
Now I don't know if you might remember that at some point of the debate I told you that a friend of hers joined the debate as well. Well I had totally forgot to block him. And for months I never hear of him again until today when he sent me a private message titled "Atheist are doomed" along with a video of the mistakes of atheism.
He said in the message that this video will show me why I should leave atheism before it's too late, and why there's nothing good from becoming and atheist.
At first I thought that it was the typical Christian video you know, that atheism are going to hell and we have the chance of salvation you know their usual M.O. I was wrong.
Check out why we atheists are doomed.



Oh and I blocked that guy this morning, in case you were wondering.

Atheist-ism as a religion is doomed. These people have no observational evidence to support the claim "there is no nothing more". Just like "jesus rose from the dead" as taught.

Absolutly no observational evidence that could hold up in court. So rational people are stuck in the middle with you ... again.

(June 25, 2014 at 9:32 am)archangle Wrote: Atheist-ism as a religion is doomed. These people have no observational evidence to support the claim "there is no nothing more". Just like "jesus rose from the dead" as taught.

Absolutly no observational evidence that could hold up in court. So rational people are stuck in the middle with you ... again.

Who is making a claim here?

Most atheists will say they don't know what happens when they/we/I die, because simply put, we don't. Can we dismiss the absurd claims of theists who propose a heaven or hell scenario without evidence to back it up? Yes, and dismiss it they/we/I do.

I have no idea what atheist-ism is as I've never seen that term used or proposed before. Could you clarify?

Why do people make this sort of vids? Oh... to suck up to the big guy... I get it... it's not aimed at us, it's for them...

Atheists are doomed. We are going to die. But then, Christians, Muslims, etc., are also doomed to die; they just can't quite admit it to themselves yet.

(June 25, 2014 at 9:45 am)Fidel_Castronaut Wrote:

(June 25, 2014 at 9:32 am)archangle Wrote: Atheist-ism as a religion is doomed. These people have no observational evidence to support the claim "there is no nothing more". Just like "jesus rose from the dead" as taught.

Absolutly no observational evidence that could hold up in court. So rational people are stuck in the middle with you ... again.

Who is making a claim here?

Most atheists will say they don't know what happens when they/we/I die, because simply put, we don't. Can we dismiss the absurd claims of theists who propose a heaven or hell scenario without evidence to back it up? Yes, and dismiss it they/we/I do.

I have no idea what atheist-ism is as I've never seen that term used or proposed before. Could you clarify?

We all make claims. Na, I aint clearifying it. I don't play mind fucked games. You know exactly what I mean. or you are stupid. Either way ...

Now back you the meat of your post.

When you claim "there is no nothing". you need evidence.

When you answer " I don't believe a guys rose from the dead because of ..." You are then correctly applying the scientific method within the limits of what is known.

Do I need to splaine that last paragraph for ya? 'Cause the quiz is tomorrow.

(June 25, 2014 at 9:55 am)archangle Wrote:

(June 25, 2014 at 9:45 am)Fidel_Castronaut Wrote: Who is making a claim here?

Most atheists will say they don't know what happens when they/we/I die, because simply put, we don't. Can we dismiss the absurd claims of theists who propose a heaven or hell scenario without evidence to back it up? Yes, and dismiss it they/we/I do.

I have no idea what atheist-ism is as I've never seen that term used or proposed before. Could you clarify?

We all make claims. Na, I aint clearifying it. I don't play mind fucked games. You know exactly what I mean. or you are stupid. Either way ...

No I've got no idea what you mean. But if you don't want to clarify I'll just assume you weren't saying anything of value, much like usual.

(June 25, 2014 at 9:55 am)archangle Wrote: Now back you the meat of your post.

When you claim "there is no nothing". you need evidence.

When you answer " I don't believe a guys rose from the dead because of ..." You are then correctly applying the scientific method with the limits of what is known.

Do I need to splaine that last paragraph for ya? 'Cause the quiz is tomorrow.

Well, as a PhD student I'm well aware of the scientific method, and I already outlined my position in the previous post which, funnily enough, you again didn't seem to reply to. I don't pretend to know what happens after we die although the lack of evidence for religious claims leads me to dismiss them.

So again I'll chalk it up to you not really saying anything of worth. Please carry on with the attitude problem though, it really suits you.

(June 25, 2014 at 9:59 am)Fidel_Castronaut Wrote:

(June 25, 2014 at 9:55 am)archangle Wrote: We all make claims. Na, I aint clearifying it. I don't play mind fucked games. You know exactly what I mean. or you are stupid. Either way ...

No I've got no idea what you mean. But if you don't want to clarify I'll just assume you weren't saying anything of value, much like usual.

(June 25, 2014 at 9:55 am)archangle Wrote: Now back you the meat of your post.

When you claim "there is no nothing". you need evidence.

When you answer " I don't believe a guys rose from the dead because of ..." You are then correctly applying the scientific method with the limits of what is known.

Do I need to splaine that last paragraph for ya? 'Cause the quiz is tomorrow.

Well, as a PhD student I'm well aware of the scientific method, and I already outlined my position in the precious post which, funnily enough, you again didn't seem to reply to. I don't pretend to know what happens after we die although the lack of evidence for religious claims leads me to dismiss them.

So again I'll chalk it up to you not really saying anything of worth. Please carry on with the attitude problem though, it really suits you.

He's popped up in a couple of other threads saying the same kind of things to me. Is this the norm?

I never trusted an atheist that can't spell 'atheist'. Poe anyone? We're serving poe today.

(June 25, 2014 at 10:00 am)FatAndFaithless Wrote:

(June 25, 2014 at 9:59 am)Fidel_Castronaut Wrote: No I've got no idea what you mean. But if you don't want to clarify I'll just assume you weren't saying anything of value, much like usual.


Well, as a PhD student I'm well aware of the scientific method, and I already outlined my position in the precious post which, funnily enough, you again didn't seem to reply to. I don't pretend to know what happens after we die although the lack of evidence for religious claims leads me to dismiss them.

So again I'll chalk it up to you not really saying anything of worth. Please carry on with the attitude problem though, it really suits you.

He's popped up in a couple of other threads saying the same kind of things to me. Is this the norm?

He's just a special and unique little butterfly that gets his knickers in a twist over everything. Don't let it bother you