|
historical merits of the bible?
|
 (June 27, 2014 at 9:33 am)FatAndFaithless Wrote: I'm not exactly sure what you mean by 'merit'. Does having merit simply mean "Not everything in the book is false"? I have to agree with this sentiment. So much of the book is inaccurate that you can't read any one given "historical" passage and know if you can trust it without verifying it. If you have to fact check all of the facts, of what use are those facts? |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Possibly Related Threads... | |||||
| Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
| How to Defend The Historical Jesus | YahwehIsTheWay | 21 | 3341 |
December 1, 2018 at 2:09 am Last Post: Cherub786 |
|
| Satanic Bible vs Christian Bible | ƵenKlassen | 31 | 9622 |
November 27, 2017 at 10:38 am Last Post: drfuzzy |
|
| Three religions sign historical agreement | Silver | 7 | 1959 |
March 18, 2014 at 9:24 pm Last Post: Rabb Allah |
|
| Any Historical Sources That Dispute The Existence Of Jesus? | Xavier | 25 | 15080 |
January 22, 2012 at 12:24 am Last Post: Cosmic Ape |
|
| Refuting the historical accuracy of the Bible | blasblas | 8 | 5794 |
September 4, 2010 at 3:41 am Last Post: blasblas |
|
