(December 19, 2008 at 12:21 pm)Purple Rabbit Wrote: He who preaches crap can at all times expect to be questioned for his motives and in fact this is what happened. Shutting out with a ban is clearly beyond questioning, it is ending communication.He who preaches crap was and is questioned. But when he who preaches crap doesn't like to be questioned so simply chooses to ignore all the questions, constantly do digressions, deliberately annoy people and flame at people. That's different. Of course if he actually responded to the questions he didn't like - at least every now and then! - that would be fine. The point was he wanted to preach crap WITHOUT being questioned. Its not good to have crap all over the forums and when its questioned have it ignored and avoided by the person preaching it and be flamed at by him.
And if we allow one Daystar type, we'd have to allow all the other Daystars or it wouldn't be fair would it? If you're talking about free speech.
And would it really be a good idea to allow a load of Daystar types preaching crap and ignoring and avoiding the questions directed to the crap they preached? And flaming at people when they felt like it?
I don't think so.
I mean, do you think otherwise? I think people who constantly behave like that all the time need to be banned. Otherwise we'd have to have lots of people who behave like that all over the forums when the forums get bigger. I don't think that would be good!
And besides, you can also tell something about his character when he did what he did after he was banned for a month! It was totally sick. Yes he was banned before that - but I've given my reasons for that! If you find it frustrating having to repeat yourself to Adrian...what about at least me (I can't speak for Adrian) having to repeat the same thing to you? Although...I'm not frustrated actually. I was with Daystar though. Because I had to repeat myself over and over and over again with him. And the difference was - it seemed he was deliberately digressing. Red herrings. Seems to be perhaps a misunderstanding with you....OR you're not digressing by accident either, you understand everything I say but just totally disagree with me.
But seriously? If you allow one Daystar type you have to allow them all. Talking about behavior. Talking about free speech. Do think its really a good idea to have all the trouble makers like Daystar over the forums? When the forums get bigger that would perhaps be way too many troublemakers IMO at least!!
Evf