RE: Legalization.
July 4, 2014 at 9:05 pm
(This post was last modified: July 4, 2014 at 9:06 pm by Losty.)
Oh I cannot quote you lol. It takes too long!
"Despite you having more liberal views than me I for the first time agreed with everything you said, except for the relative part, I think at least you should warn a close person if there is one, sometimes people are emotionally unstable and talking with your wife/brother/son etc can change the odds. It's still a decision, just a precaution to be taken."
I will agree with you that a person should warn a close relative. I will not agree that they should be legally required to.
Again, I don't know how your country's constitution works. My country's constitution establishes rights for citizens and limitations for government not the other way around.
You never have to decide whether someone being allowed to do something goes against the constitution. You never have to have a constitutional justification to not restrict a freedom. Nothing has always been illegal. Everything starts out being legal. So if something is made to be illegal, you would then have to decide if that restriction of freedom is constitutionally justifiable. If it is not then you strike the law from your books. You don't have to create legislation to allow it again you just have to remove the legislation that banned it. As I said, everything is legal until it is made to be illegal.
"Despite you having more liberal views than me I for the first time agreed with everything you said, except for the relative part, I think at least you should warn a close person if there is one, sometimes people are emotionally unstable and talking with your wife/brother/son etc can change the odds. It's still a decision, just a precaution to be taken."
I will agree with you that a person should warn a close relative. I will not agree that they should be legally required to.
Again, I don't know how your country's constitution works. My country's constitution establishes rights for citizens and limitations for government not the other way around.
You never have to decide whether someone being allowed to do something goes against the constitution. You never have to have a constitutional justification to not restrict a freedom. Nothing has always been illegal. Everything starts out being legal. So if something is made to be illegal, you would then have to decide if that restriction of freedom is constitutionally justifiable. If it is not then you strike the law from your books. You don't have to create legislation to allow it again you just have to remove the legislation that banned it. As I said, everything is legal until it is made to be illegal.
