Blackout--Regarding #2 God Exists, I was pointing out that using miracles as an argument that science has disproven the Bible is not a good argument, because I could posit that God exists.
Regarding the actual premise, the existence of God seems more plausible that the negative.
There is not scientific evidence that the human mind can stand in causal relationship to a natural event. Complete randomness would not be immune to the laws of nature.
Regarding the actual premise, the existence of God seems more plausible that the negative.
There is not scientific evidence that the human mind can stand in causal relationship to a natural event. Complete randomness would not be immune to the laws of nature.