RE: Disproving the Bible
July 7, 2014 at 12:33 pm
(This post was last modified: July 7, 2014 at 12:42 pm by Baqal.)
@SteveII
-Then your definition of miracles is not the same as mine. Please explain
Gladly. Under my definition, miracles are a rare phenomena that people apply to the intervention of something supernatural (in most cases, a god). The reason for why I think miracles don't need to be necessarily applied to a divinity is because none have been observed by researchers. Why? Because the people that believe in the miracle will call the analysis done by these researchers blasphemy. That is why I'm skeptical about it. Are they really up to protect a miracle from violation, or are they preventing scientists to discover that their miracle is a fraud?
-Then your definition of miracles is not the same as mine. Please explain
Gladly. Under my definition, miracles are a rare phenomena that people apply to the intervention of something supernatural (in most cases, a god). The reason for why I think miracles don't need to be necessarily applied to a divinity is because none have been observed by researchers. Why? Because the people that believe in the miracle will call the analysis done by these researchers blasphemy. That is why I'm skeptical about it. Are they really up to protect a miracle from violation, or are they preventing scientists to discover that their miracle is a fraud?
