(July 9, 2014 at 11:04 pm)Muslim Atheism Wrote:(July 9, 2014 at 10:17 pm)Losty Wrote: I accept the definition that is listed in the fucking dictionary, asshat.
You still don't get it, right ?
That's what I said, it is a fallacy. . . ie. it is the fallacy of appeal to authority (the dictionary), and when I dispute the meaning of Allah with the main premise of Islam, the Shahada. . together with proof and valid premises.
Muhammad's Allah
(July 8, 2014 at 8:48 pm)Muslim Atheism Wrote: Premise 1: No God
Premise 2: Only Allah
Premises in negative form (No God), and affirmative form (Only Allah). Two contradictory premises, "No" and "Only" (yes). Therefore it is impossible for Allah to be a God and invalidating the first premise of "No God". There is no way Allah is a God.
How do you explain these premises, since you are repeatedly saying all sort things in here. . . . as absolute.
And again I ask, what proof?
I am not even arguing your beliefs. I am simply stating that you are not a Muslim in the traditional sense of the word.
If accepting the definition of words is the fallacy of appeal to authority that explains why all you ever say is a bunch of mumbo jumbo. You make your own definitions for everything because you refuse to submit to the authority of a tyrant dictionary.
