Disproving the Bible

[Angrboda]

The bias of naturalism is a huge concern of mine. For example, no matter what science discovers, you will never ever believe in a theory that has God as part of the equation. They have no alternative than to believe in evolution. How many scientist would fit that description?

A theory with evidence for the existence of God, or just something that's "more plausible than not" in a philosophical doodle?

You're equivocating Steve. You're suggesting that scientists won't accept equally good evidence for God when what you have isn't even evidence.

Produce good evidence for God, science will listen. If you don't have evidence, don't pretend that the reason science doesn't listen is because of "bias".