Vaccines are a plot by big pharma!

[Bad Writer]

Why do we need to admit something that is entirely based on anecdotal evidence? (Anecdotal evidence is useless for a claim that requires demonstrable evidence.)

You such a purest aren't you, you would believe anything they say.

So, how does agreeing with good evidence make anyone a "purist"? I'd be a purist if I were to take all claims from [insert name of person or group here], no matter if there was evidence or not.

Speaking of which, who here was caught accepting anecdotal evidence over demonstrable evidence? Oh! That's right! It was you. That's the true sign of a purist, for anecdotal evidence without anything real to back it up can neither be confirmed nor verified, especially when it's found on the internet. Example: people that laud the "efficacy" of alternative medicines or homeopathy.