RE: Abortion dialogue I've been having...
May 18, 2010 at 3:09 am
(This post was last modified: May 18, 2010 at 3:10 am by Violet.)
(May 17, 2010 at 10:57 pm)Samson Wrote: I am Pro-Choice, but with conditions...lolOh?
Quote:1. Anyone Woman/child who is raped/molested should always have the choice of Abortion.How is that a condition of choice? That is the default if we are beginning from free choices...
Quote:2. I do not believe Abortions should be used as a form of Birth-ControlWhy not?
Quote:a. If the Woman has already had 3 abortions, then cut her off, unless my #1 stands into place.Why?
Quote:b. If a Woman has had children taken by the state and 3 abortions later has occurred, then I believe a reversal tube-tie should be in order.And is what you believe also what the woman believes? If not: why should your beliefs have any particular precedence over her own? Is this not her body we are referring to here? Would you presume to have rights over her own in regards to her body?
Quote:3. If the mother's life is in any medically subscribed danger, whatsoever, then an abortion should be available to her.
Oh? And when should it not be available...? Your examples above seem rather silly in my eyes... but perhaps you will explain them?
Define 'medically subscribed danger' for me... then tally that with the facts that bearing children is often 'the ruiner of vaginas' (and other features of one's body); possessing the damn things is often damn near psychological hell; supporting their continued existence is a massive expenditure of one's time, money, and often happiness.
Frankly, I do not understand why anyone would want children at all if it weren't for maternal instinct... indeed that functions even in me. Past that though, one can easily recognize the sodding blighters for the costly parasites they are... and why anyone would want to curse a woman with forcing her to deal with one of these when she doesn't yet want to seems to me not only cruel, unfair, and insensitive... but positively unnerving that people can be so ignorant of how horrible children are that they would value children (that aren't even infants yet!) more than the poor fucker that would bear the damned thing.
(May 18, 2010 at 2:54 am)tackattack Wrote: Did Sae just advocate for more thought policing?hock:
![Huh Huh](https://atheistforums.org/images/smilies/huh.gif)
![Huh Huh](https://atheistforums.org/images/smilies/huh.gif)
Please give me a home where cloud buffalo roam
Where the dear and the strangers can play
Where sometimes is heard a discouraging word
But the skies are not stormy all day