I think that when a book is 'left up to interpretation' as to its validity, we can pretty much safely assume it's bunk.
Actual math, science and history texts are not 'left up to interpretation.' Because they are based on FACTS. lol
If you hand the Bible to 1000 different people, religious and/or otherwise, you will get 1000 different 'interpretations' as to how to view it. What to take literally...etc. etc.
It's up to interpretation because it's a manmade invention, nothing more or less. I don't need to go into the various passages ''disproving'' this or that. For the person I would be retorting against no doubt will reply with...''well, that's left up to interpretation.'' lol
Actual math, science and history texts are not 'left up to interpretation.' Because they are based on FACTS. lol
If you hand the Bible to 1000 different people, religious and/or otherwise, you will get 1000 different 'interpretations' as to how to view it. What to take literally...etc. etc.
It's up to interpretation because it's a manmade invention, nothing more or less. I don't need to go into the various passages ''disproving'' this or that. For the person I would be retorting against no doubt will reply with...''well, that's left up to interpretation.'' lol