If the leadership of a church body causes a person to become suicidal through bullying, who has an interest in hearing about the behaviour that brought the matter to such a head?
I have heard people argue that it's a matter to be dealt with by the leadership of the organisation and no-one else.
I 've heard people argue that the congregation should be alerted to what's happened in their name.
I've also heard that the if the church seeks to influence public policy and sway individual opinions outside the church, the community they want to change deserve to know the ethical mien of the body calling for such change.
Thoughts welcome.
I have heard people argue that it's a matter to be dealt with by the leadership of the organisation and no-one else.
I 've heard people argue that the congregation should be alerted to what's happened in their name.
I've also heard that the if the church seeks to influence public policy and sway individual opinions outside the church, the community they want to change deserve to know the ethical mien of the body calling for such change.
Thoughts welcome.
