RE: The redneck strike again.
July 21, 2014 at 9:30 am
(This post was last modified: July 21, 2014 at 9:34 am by Little Rik.)
(July 21, 2014 at 8:51 am)Natachan Wrote: You are a very confusing person.
Your argument seems to be that meat causes problems with heart disease, but you link an article that talks about the problems with thin people with metabolic syndrome. A two second google search pinpointed insulin resistance and one of the leading causes of metabolic syndrome. Insulin resistance is caused by, again, processed carbohydrates and starches (ok, to be fair it's caused by prolonged diet problems with elevated blood sugar and foods with high glycemic indexes. This does however simplify to carbs and starch). I have done a great deal of reading into this subject, since my family has thyroid issues and my father has been diagnosed with diabetes. Guess what the doctors recommend for our diet. Protein. A lot of it. And little to no starches.
Heart disease also has strong links to stress, smoking, drug use. When you say more omnivores show up with heart problems my answer will be that a disproportionate amount of those will probably be smokers or former smokers. A large number will also have diets heavy in starchy corn products, since corn is cheap.
Meat is not the only cause of heart attack and strokes but it is the main cause.
As you say there are other factors as well.
Take the south pacific islanders.
They go mad for corn beef in the tin which is something that has been introduced by the white man.
Not many of them smoke or are under stress but most of them got diabetes and many are victims of heart attack and strokes.
They have always eaten a diet high on starches and they still do but why is that they got sick only when they started eating meat in the tin?
(July 21, 2014 at 9:15 am)rasetsu Wrote:(July 21, 2014 at 7:46 am)Riketto Wrote: Your arrogance and stupidity is behind belief.
You believe any hypothesis that is coming from wiki.
You were the one quoting Wikipedia in support of your argument. I simply showed that the entry you cited didn't support you.
So you're both a moron and a hypocrite.
The difference between me and you is that i cited wiki saying very clearly that i show HYPOTESIS.
You on the contrary show wiki as FACTS.
If you are so blind not to see the huge difference then is time to make a booking for a nursing home.