(July 21, 2014 at 4:00 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote: You want us to just ignore that while they 'analyze' a scientific article? Nope, sorry. Its like listening to an anti-vaxxer criticizing an article that says vaccines are useful. We cant ignore the lens through which these people are operating, and its a lens that's utterly deformed and corrupted through willful ignorance, manipulation of data, unscientific practices, and dogmatism.
And yes, if an atheist were to engage in this kind of huckster-like pseudoscience crap they would be called out just as much.
For example: http://atheistforums.org/thread-22331-page-35.html There are pages and pages of an atheist being called out for citing pseudo science.
If there is a god, I want to believe that there is a god. If there is not a god, I want to believe that there is no god.